Technology/AI October 10, 2025

Amnesty International urges Scotland to ban live facial recognition for law enforcement

5:35 PM (5 hours, 19 minutes ago)
👁️ 1 views
100 SCORE
Prophetic Relevance Analysis
4 prophetic indicators detected • Source reliability: 8/10

📄 Article Content

# Amnesty International urges Scotland to ban live facial recognition for law enforcement

Human rights group also has concerns about retrospective facial searches

Oct 10, 2025, 12:43 pm EDT | Stephen Mayhew

Categories Biometrics News | Facial Recognition | Law Enforcement

Amnesty International has called on the Scottish government to prohibit the use of live facial Recognition (LFR), describing the biometric technology as a “mode of mass surveillance” which is incompatible with Scotland’s human rights obligations.

In letters to Police Scotland, the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) and Scottish Justice Secretary Angela Constance, the human rights organization also requested a clear and detailed look into Police Scotland’s plans to introduce LFR and a formal assessment of its compatibility with human rights laws.

“Amnesty wants to see a ban on this technology in Scotland and globally,” writes Liz Thomson, acting Scotland programme director for Amnesty International UK.

In her letters, Thompson argues that facial recognition involves “widespread and bulk monitoring, collection, storage and analysis of biometrics-based identification at scale, without consent, and without reasonable suspicion.”

Police Scotland confirmed their decision to use live facial recognition in August. The decision was met with immediate criticism from both lawmakers and rights groups.

Fourteen rights and racial justice organisations, including Amnesty, Big Brother Watch, Privacy International and Liberty, called on the law enforcement agency to “immediately abandon” their LFR plans.

“There is no specific legislation governing police use of this technology, meaning that police forces across the UK are already deploying this technology absent of meaningful accountability or oversight,” Madeleine Stone, senior advocacy officer at Big Brother Watch, said in an August release.

The police say it is currently working on evaluating the technology and related regulation, as well as providing a